Influence of Vortex Disturbances on Laminar-Turbulent Transition in Supersonic Boundary Layer on a Swept Wing at M = 2.5

Andrey D. Dryasov
1. Khristianovich Institute of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics SB RAS Novosibirsk, Russian Federation
dushadryaso v@gmail. com
Yuri G. Yermolaev
1. Khristianovich Institute of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics SB RAS Novosibirsk, Russian Federation
2. Novosibirsk State University Novosibirsk, Russian Federation
yermol@itam.nsc.ru
Aleksandr D. Kosinov
1. Khristianovich Institute of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences Novosibirsk, Russian Federation
2. Novosibirsk State University Novosibirsk, Russian Federation
kosinov@itam.nsc.ru
The material was received by the Editorial Board: 16.02.2016
Experimental investigations of the receptivity of a supersonic boundary layer on a swept wing to the vortex perturbations were made at Mach 2.5. A symmetrical wing model with a 45° sweep angle and a 3-percent-thick circular-arc airfoil was used in experiments. The investigation of the vortex disturbances structure generated by a wire was done. It has been shown that the level of disturbances in the free flow increases with increasing wire diameter. The positions of the laminarturbulent transition at different diameters of wire were determined and data of the disturbances development in the model boundary layer were obtained. It was found that an increase in the intensity of vortex disturbances in the free flow leads to an earlier transition. Receptivity coefficients were determined.

Keywords:
supersonic boundary layer, vortex disturbances, laminar-turbulent transition. 
УДК 532.526

Influence of Vortex Disturbances on Laminar-Turbulent Transition in Supersonic Boundary Layer on a Swept Wing at M = 2.5
References: Dryasov A. D., Yermolaev Yu. G., Kosinov A. D., Semionov N. V., Semionov A. N. Influence of Vortex Disturbances on Laminar-Turbulent Transition in Supersonic Boundary Layer on a Swept Wing at M = 2.5. Vestnik NSU. Series: Physics. 2016, vol. 11, no. 1. P. 16–22. (in Russ.). DOI: 10.54362/1818-7919-2016-11-1-16-22