Challenges in forming favorable ecological situation in Russia аnd the ways of their overcoming

Olga P. Burmatova
1. Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia
2. Novosibirsk State University
burmatova@ngs.ru
The material was received by the Editorial Board: 20/02/2017
Abstract
The main challenges in the environmental field in Russia were analyzed. It has been shown threats in the formation of favorable ecological situation which should be overcome first. Accents on the weakness of the modern state environmental policy in Russia are made primarily on those of its elements, which are designed to stimulate environmental management in enterprises. Among the main environmental challenges, the author outlines, in particular, the following: the need to form an innovative economy, the possibility of modernizing the economy in the conditions of the economic crisis, the weakness of modern state environmental policy in the Russian Federation, the need to develop and implement new effective instruments in the field of environmental regulation, strict observance of environmental legislation, etc. Particular attention is paid to the key aspects of developing an environmental regional strategy, which is considered as one of the ways to solve environmental problems. Analysis of modern environmental challenges will help to develop a strategy for overcoming them and accordingly transform state environmental policy.

Keywords
ecological safety, environmental policy, environmental legislation, environmental charges and taxes, environmental strategy



References
  1. Zakharov A. V. Terminological definition of contemporary global environmental challenges: distinction from similar concepts. Theory and practice of social development, 2012, no. 10, p. 312–316. (In Russ.) 
  2. Bobylev S. N., Zakharov V. M. Krizis: ekonomika i ekologiya [Crisis: economy and ecology]. Moscow, Printing House LEVKO, Institute for Sustainable Development, Center for Environmental Policy of Russia, 2009, 84 p. (In Russ.) 
  3. Burmatova О. P. Innovatsionnyy vector ekologizatsii proizvodstva [Innovative vector of greening production. Proceeding IX International Scientific and Practical Conference "Innovative Development of the Russian Economy". Moscow, "RER. G. V. Plekhanov", 2016, vol. 6: Regional and branch potential of the innovation economy, p. 166–169. (In Russ.) 
  4. Burmatova О. P. Novosibirskaya oblast' kak ob"yekt strategicheskikh razrabotok: ekologicheskiy stsenariy [Novosibirsk region as an object of strategic developments: the ecological scenario]. In; Actual problems of Novosibirsk region development and ways of their solution:  A. S. Novoselov, A. P. Kulayev (Ed.); IEIE SB RAS. Novosibirsk, 2014, part 2. p. 5–41. (In Russ.) 
  5. Danilov-Danilyan V. I. Science, education and upbringing in the modern world in the face of an environmental challenge. (In Russ.) 
  6. Piskulova N. Razvitie mirovoy ekonomiki: ekologicheskiy vector. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2010, № 12, p. 28–37. (In Russ.) 
  7. Rodionova I. A., Lipina S. A. Zelenaya ekonomika v Rossii: model’ i prognozy razvitiya. Fundamental’nye issledovaniya, 2015, № 2-24, p. 5462–5466. (In Russ.)
  8. Prioritety natsional'noy ekologicheskoy politiki Rossii. [Priorities of Russia's National Environmental Policy]. Ed. by V. M. Zakharov. Moscow, OOO "Printing House LEVKO", Institute for Sustainable Development / Center for Environmental Policy of Russia, 2009, 152 p. (In Russ.) 
  9. Pusenkova N. N., Solntseva E. A. Ekologicheskaya otvetstvennost' rossiyskogo biznesa: mify i real'nost'. [Environmental responsibility of Russian business: myths and reality]. National Export Today, 2006, № 4. (In Russ.) 
  10. Burmatova О. P. Environmental Strategy for the Social and Economic Development of the Region. Region: Economics and Sociology, 2014, no. 3, p. 219–245. (In Russ.)
References: Burmatova О.P. Challenges in forming favorable ecological situation in Russia аnd the ways of their overcoming. World of Economics and Management. 2017, vol. 17, no. 3. P. 19–34. DOI: 10.25205/2542-0429-2017-17-3-19-34