Recent Trends in Construction and Residential Real Estate Management

Tatyana P. Cheremisina
1. Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia
2. Novosibirsk State University
cherem@ieie.nsc.ru
The material was received by the Editorial Board: 03/05/2017
Abstract
The composition of the residential real estate and the structure of Russian housing market do not match: primary and secondary markets are supplemented by a considerable in size non-market sector of residential real estate – the stock of dilapidated housing and buildings in a state of emergency that is filling up the secondary market with rapidly growing volume of worn out properties. While the developmental model of entrepreneurship is gradually settling in the primary housing market, and in general the “soviet” model of management (management companies are not that different from the soviet property management agencies) is remaining in the secondary market, the nonmarket sector requires a formulation of an adequate management model that would allow the private and public management of residential real estate at the same time. Mega-project of renovation of the 5-storey buildings in Moscow will support the formation of such a model and the legal grounds for its existence.

Keywords
housing market, construction and management of residential real estate, models of entrepreneurship in the area of residential real estate, development



References
  1. Zhilaja nedvizhimost': kvartirnyj naves. Expert Online, 2017, № 10 (1020). (In Russ.) 
  2. Hayretdinova R. S. Innovacionnye napravlenija razvitija zhilishhno-kommunal'nogo hozjajstva. Russian Journal of Entrepreneurship, 2014, № 21.  (In Russ.) 
  3. Nelyubina O. M., Tolstyh Yu. O., Mihalina S. S., Uchinina T. V. Sravnenie osobennostej organizacii kapital'nogo remonta i rekonstrukcii zdanij v Rossii i za rubezhom. Modern problems of science and education, 2014, № 5. URL:  (In Russ.) 
  4. Ibragimova Z. F., Yaparova-Abbulhalikova G. I. O nekotoryh problemah v sfere vethogo i avarijnogo zhil'ja. Bulletin USPTU. Science, education, economy. Series economy, 2015, № 1. URL: (In Russ.)
  5. Buzyrev V. V. Renovacija zhilyh domov kak vazhnyj faktor uvelichenija zhiznennogo cik-la zhilishhnogo fonda v regione. Problems of modern economics, 2012, № 4, p. 285–288. 
  6. Seljutina L. G. Naemnoe zhil'e – novaja zhilishhnaja politika goroda. Ekonomicheskie nauki [Economic sciences], 2017, № 4 (58), p. 117–122. (In Russ.) 
  7. Dyudchenko A. Y. Legal regulation of development. Scientific Journal of KubSAU, 2014, № 100 (06). (In Russ.) 
  8. Golovanov E. B., Kiseleva V. A., Larin O. N. Development kak osobyj vid predprinimatel'skoj deja-tel'nosti na rynke nedvizhimosti. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovanija [Modern problems of science and education], 2012, № 2. (In Russ.)
  9. Volodina Yu. I., Agafonova M. S. Stanovlenie i razvitie predprinimatel'skoj dejatel'nosti na rynke zhil'ja Rossii. Nauchnoe obozrenie. Ekonomicheskie nauki [Scientific review. Economic sciences], 2016, № 3, p. 21–25. (In Russ.) 
  10. Gribov A. P. Formation of economy of business in the market of housing construction. Russian Journal of Entrepreneurship, 2013, № 2 (224).(In Russ.)
References: Cheremisina T.P. Recent Trends in Construction and Residential Real Estate Management. World of Economics and Management. 2017. vol 17, no. 3. P. 100–111. DOI: 10.25205/2542-0429-2017-17-3-100-111