Assessment of the Possibilities for the Development of Domestic Production of Oil and Gas Engineering

Abstract
The article shows an attempt to determine possible investments and results from the implementation of state plans to localize in Russia the production of machinery and equipment most related to their imports. Problems of localization or import substitution aggravated as a result of the events of 2014. State (departmental) plans for import substitution adopted in 2014 did not contain indicators that characterize the import substitution process itself. In an article on the example of localization of oil and gas engineering industries, an attempt is made to determine some of these indicators. The methodological basis for calculating the required investments and the possible effect was a simplified model of the interbranch balance sheet, which was built on the input-output tables for 2014. The obtained results of calculations are mainly illustrative, showing the possibility of using the input-output tables for analysis and evaluation of the consequences of large government decisions.

Keywords: 
localization, import substitution, large state decision, oil and gas engineering, import substitution plan, input-output tables, economic-mathematical model, investments, gross added value



Refernces:

1. Kershenbaum V. Ya. Modern problems of competitiveness of Russian oil and gas equipment. Gazovya promyshlennost’ [Gas Industry], 2012, March, no. 671. (In Russ.)
2. Golkov A. S. Oil and gas engineering in the Russian Federation: trends and development prospects. Economicheskie nauki [Economic Sciences], 2009, vol. 12 (61), p. 268–270. (In Russ.)
3.  Kratena K., Streicher G. Macroeconomic Input-Output Modelling – Structures, Functional Forms and Closure Rules. International Input-Output Association, Working Papers in Input-Output Economics. WPIOX09-009, September 2009. 
4. The study of the Russian economy using models with fuzzy parameters. Eds. A. O. Baranov, V. N. Pavlov. Novosibirsk, Novosibirsk State University Press, 2009. (In Russ.) 
5. Baranov A. O., Gilmundinov V. M., Pavlov V. N. The study of the Russian economy using interbranch models. Novosibirsk, Nauka, 2001. (In Russ.)
6.  Ozerov V. K. Analysis of the dynamics of socialist expanded reproduction and the experience of its modeling. Novosibirsk, Nauka, 1984. (In Russ.)
7.  Shatilov N. F. Modeling of extended reproduction. Moscow, Economics Publ., 1967, 175 p. (In Russ.) 
8. Baranov E. F. Problems of the development of the scheme of the dynamic model of the interindustry balance. Economics and the Mathematical Methods, 1968, vol. 4, iss. 1, p. 26–40. (In Russ.)
9. Baranov E. F., Kim I. A., Piontkovsky D. I., Staritsyna E. A. Questions of construction of tables «input – output» of Russia in the international classifiers. HSE Economic Journal, 2014, no. 1, p. 7–40. (In Russ.)
10. Suvorov N. V. Methods and results of macroeconomic analysis of production efficiency in the real sector of the domestic economy. Problemy prognozirovaniya [Studies on Russian Economic Development], 2008, no. 3, p. 3–16. (In Russ.)
11. Kim I. A. Modeling of interbranch flows in symmetric tables «input – output» of Russia (1995–2002). Thesis for the degree of candidate of economic sciences. Moscow, 2006. (In Russ.)
12. Shchukin B. N., Shabranskaya N. I. Evaluation of structural shifts by the input – output method. Vector of Science of Togliatti State University. Series: Economics and Management, 2015, no. 2 (21), p. 76–80. (In Russ.) 
13. Ermakova S. Yu. Theory of the multiplier and the multiplier effects in the economy. Thesis for the degree of candidate of economic sciences. Ulan-Ude, 2006. (In Russ.)