The institutional development of Russia:transition to contractual razdatok

Olga E. Bessonova
1. Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia
The material was received by the Editorial Board: 22/01/2018
The article presents key provisions of the integral-institutional paradigm, which is a new tool for analyzing institutional development. In the new paradigm, the market and razdatok (nonmarket economies) are viewed as universal development mechanisms. As a result of institutional evolution, during which the razdatok and the market improved their forms, a new reality is being formed in the 21st century, which is no longer in opposition to market and razdatok economies, but in their integration. Integration of the market and razdatok leads to the formation of either a quasi-market model or a contractual razdatok. The key properties of these basic institutional models of the 21st century are analyzed. The quasi-market is the reason for the rent-oriented motivation and stagnation of the economy, while the contractual razdatok is a new universal model leading to dynamic growth. The main result of the paradigm is the justification of the possibility of Russia's transition to the open access social order.

integral institutional paradigm, open access social order, quasi-market, contractual razdatok


  1. Mcconnell C. R., Brue S. L. Ekonomiks: printsipy, problemy i politika [Economics: principles, problems and policies]. Moscow, Respublika Publ., 1993, vol. 1, 399 p. (in Russ.) 
  2. Clarke J. Za ramkami gosudarstvennogo i chastnogo? Transformatsiya smeshannoi modeli blagosostoyaniya [Beyond public and private? The changing welfare mix]. Zhurnal issledovanii sotsial'noi politiki, 2011, vol. 9, no. 2, p. 151–168. (in Russ.) 
  3. Nort D., Uollis D., Vajngast B. Nasilie i social'nye porjadki. Konceptual'nye ramki dlja interpretacii pis'mennoj istorii chelovechestva [Violence and Social Orders: A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Recorded Human History]. Moscow, Institut Gajdara Publ., 2009, 480 p. (in Russ.) 
  4. Higgs R. Krizis i Leviafan: Povorotnyye momenty rosta amerikanskogo pravitelstva [Crisis and Leviathan. Critical episodes in the growth of american government]. Moscow, IRISEN, Mysl', 2010, 500 p. (in Russ.) 
  5. Hirshman A. Exit, voice, and loyalty responses to decline in firms, organizations, and state. Moscow, Novoe izdatel'stvo, 2009, 150 p. (in Russ.) 
  6. Le Grand J. The other invisible hand: Delivering public services through choice and competition. Moscow, Institut Gajdara Publ., 2011, 240 p. (in Russ.) 
  7. Hayden Gregory F. An Evaluation of Institutional Matrices Theory Which Was Designed to Illustrate Differences Between Russian and Western Political Economies. Journal of Economic Issues, 2017, vol. 51, no. 2, p. 467–475. DOI 10.1080/00213624.2017.1321404 
  8. Block F. The Sate and the Economy. Ekonomicheskaya sotsiologiya, 2004, vol. 5, no. 2, p. 37–56. (in Russ.) 
  9. Bessonova O. E. The Market and Razdatok in Russia Matrix: From Confrontation to Integration. Moscow, ROSSPEN Publ., 2015, 151 p. (in Russ.) 
  10. Acemoglu D., Robinson J. Why Nations Fail. The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty. Moscow, AST Publ., 2015, 693 p. (in Russ.) 
  11. Anchishkina O. Contract institutions in the Russian economy: The sphere of state, municipal, and regulated procurement. Voprosy ekonomiki, 2017, no. 11, p. 93– 110. (in Russ.) 

References: Bessonova O.E. The institutional development of Russia:transition to contractual razdatok. World of Economics and Management. 2018. vol. 18, 2. P. 21–33. DOI: 10.25205/2542-0429-2018-18-2-21-33