Social Capital and Economic Welfare: Perspectives of Russia

Kondratieva E.V.
1. Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia
2. Novosibirsk State University
spinoff@ya.ru
The material was received by the Editorial Board: 08/08/2018

Abstract 

Over the last decade, the studies on economic growth have added new empirical evidence on the relationship between social capital and economic welfare. The article examines the approaches to the empirical study of social capital and suggests the analysis of various social groups, including Olsen-type groups, and Putnam-type groups depending on the radius of confidence. A comparable cross-country analysis of the level of trust as an indicator of social capital accumulated in the society was carried out. Based on the World Value Survey and the Russian regional data, it was shown that the confidence in groups with a wide radius of confidence correlates with the level of their economic welfare. The study reveals that in the Russian society there exists a number of prerequisites for the formation of social groups in terms of enhancing economic growth by bridging social capital, i.e. Putnam-type groups. 

Keywords 
economic growth, social capital, Putnam-type groups, Olsen-type groups, institutional economics 

Funding 
The research was carried out with the state assignment IEIE SB RAS project XI.172.1.1 “Integration and interaction of the sectors systems and markets in Russia and its Eastern regions: restrictions and new opportunities” АААА-А17-
117022250132-2 



References
  1. Yasin E. G. Modernizatsiya i obshhestvo. Voprosy ekonomiki, 2007, no. 5, p. 4–29. (in Russ.) 
  2. Putnam R. Making Democracy Work: Civic Tradition in Modern Italy. Princeton, Princeton Uni. Press, 1993. 
  3. Olson M. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge, MA, Harvard Uni. Press, 1965. 
  4. Furkuyma F. Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity. New York, Free Press, 1995. 
  5. Polischuk L., Menyashev R. Economic Significance of Social Capital. Voprosy ekonomiki. 2011. no 12. p. 46–65. 
  6. Aghion P., Algan Y., Cahuc P., Shleifer A. Regulation and Distrust. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2010, vol. 125, no. 3, p. 1015–1049. 
  7. Knack S., Keefer Ph. Does Social Capital Have an Economic Payoff? A Cross-Country Investigation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1997, vol. 112, no. 4, p. 1251–1288. 
  8. Ke R., Zhang Zh. Trust in China: A Cross-Regional Analysis. William Davidson Institute, 2003, working paper no. 586.  
  9. Knack S. Social Capital and the Quality of Government: Evidence from the States. American Journal of Political Science, 2002, vol. 16, no. 4, p. 772–783.

 
References: Kondratieva E. V. Social Capital and Economic Welfare: Perspectives of Russia. World of Economics and Management. 2018. vol 18, 4. P. 42–54. DOI: 10.25205/2542-0429-2018-18-4-42-54