Conceptual constructions of modern scientific and technological development: review of foreign approaches

Tatyana S. Novikova
1. Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia
2. Novosibirsk State University
Korolkova Maria V.
1. Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia
The material was received by the Editorial Board: 02/12/2018
At the threshold of the new millennium, there was a change in the dominant conceptual framework used to analyze scientific and technological development (STD). The article outlines the directions for the transformation of methodological approaches under the conditions of modern scientific and technological revolution. First, an overview of conceptual constructions of scientific and technological revolution is given with an emphasis on its main stages and the corresponding change in the trajectories of technological development by analyzing the change in technological paradigms, including in the context of long-term cyclical changes based on Kondratieff’s and Akamatsu’s theory as well as various industrial revolutions. The trends of the modern scientific and technological  revolution are viewed in accordance with the stages of modeling long-term waves and the fourth industrial revolution. Special attention is paid to the research method of science and technology (STS). The STS method is a new conceptual approach to the study of 
scientific and technological revolution and includes laboratory research, actor-network theory, and the methods  of ethnomethodology, scientific metrics, and constructing knowledge spaces. Approaches to the study of the role of 
ethics are presented as an important part of the concept of scientific and technological revolution, including the analysis of values in the formation of technologies, methods for studying ethics-related issues in STS, growing inequality in modern conditions, and technological moral actions. 

scientific and technological development, long wave, method of research of science and technology, ethics of scientific and technological development 

Read article

  1. Kuhn T. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, 1962. (2nd ed. Chicago, 1970). 
  2. Dosi G. Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: a suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Research Policy, 1982, vol. 11, p. 147–162. 
  3. Perez C. Microelectronics, Long waves and structural change: New Perspectives for developing countries. World Development, 1985, vol. 13, no. 3, p. 441–63. 
  4. Freeman C. Preface to Part II. In: Dosi G. (ed.). Technical change an economic theory. Londres, 1988. 
  5. Perez C. Technological revolutions and techno-economic paradigms. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 2010, vol. 34, iss. 1, p. 185–202. 
  6. Tunzelmann N., Malerba F., Nightinagale P., Metcalfe S. Technological paradigms: past, present and future. Industrial and Corporate Change, 2008, vol. 17, no. 3, p. 467–484. 
  7. Ho J. C., Lee C. S. A Typology of technological change: Technological paradigm theory with validation and generalization from case studies. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 2015, vol. 97, p. 128–139. 
  8. Christensen C. M. The Innovator's dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail. New York, HarperCollins, 2000. 
  9. Holtz G., Brugnach M., Wostl C. Specifying “regime” – a framework for defining and describing regimes in transition research. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2008, vol. 75, p. 623–643. 
  10. Dosi G. Statistical Regularities in the Evolution of Industries. A Guide Through Some Evidence and Challenges for the Theory. In: Malerba F., Brusoni S. (eds.). Perspectives on Innovation. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2007, p. 439–465. 
  11. Attar M., Termizel G. Strategic choice perspective to technological change. European Scientific Journal, 2015, special ed., p. 1–29. 
  12. Caselli F., Coleman W. The world technology frontier. In: Working Paper 7904. NBER Working Paper Series, 2000, p. 1–31. 
  13. Kruger J. Revisiting the world technology frontier: a directional distance function approach. Journal of Economic Growth, 2017, vol. 22, p. 67–95. 
  14. Meier G., Stiglitz J. (eds.). Frontiers of development economics: The Future in perspective. The World Bank, 2001. 
  15. Reinert E. S. How reach countries got reach… And why poor countries stay poor. London, 2011. 
  16. Crepon B., Duguet E., Mairesse J. Research and development, innovation and productivity: an econometric analysis at the firm level. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 1998, vol. 7, no. 2, p. 115–158. 
  17. Radosevic S., Yoruk E. Why Do We Need Theory and Metrics of Technology Upgrading? Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 2016, vol. 24, issue sup1. DOI 10.1080/19761597.2016.1207415 
  18. Kondratiev N. D. Osoboe mnenie: Izbrannye proizvedeniya [Special opinion: Selected works]. Moscow, Nauka, 1993. (in Russ.) 
  19. Diebolt C. Long cycles revisited. An essay in econometric history.  Economies et Sociétés, Série AF: Histoire Economique Quantitative, 2005, vol. 32, p. 23–47. 
  20. Metz R. Do Kondratieff waves exist? How time series techniques can help to solve the problem. Cliometrica, 2011, vol. 5, no. 3, p. 205–238. 
  21. Focacci A. Controversial curves of the economy: An up-to-date investigation of long waves? Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 2017, vol. 116, p. 271–285. 
  22. Caballero J. A. Do surges in international capital inflows influence the likelihood of banking crises? Journal of Economics, 2016, vol. 126, no. 591, p. 281–316
  23. Basu K., Stiglitz J. E. Sovereign debt and joint liability: an economic theory model for amending the Treaty of Lisbon. Journal of Economics, 2015, vol. 125, no. 586, p. F115–F130. 
  24. Jutasompakorn P., Brooks R. B. C., Treepongkaruna S. Banking crises: identifying dates and determinants.  Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions & Money, 2014,  vol. 32, p. 150–166. 
  25. Kopala M., Budden J. The Dog Bone Portfolio: A Personal Odyssey into the First Kondratieff Winter. Toronto, BPS Books, 2015. 
  26. Batra R. End Unemployment Now-how to Eliminate Joblessness, Debt, and Poverty. New York, Palgrave Macmillan, 2015. 
  27. Michaillat P., Saez E., Aggregate demand, idle time, and unemployment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2015, vol. 130, no. 2, p. 507–566. 
  28. Teimouri S. Currency crises and dynamics of real wages. Review of World Economics, 2015, vol. 151, no. 2, p. 377–403. 
  29. Devenezas T., Corredine J. The biological determinants of long-wave behavior in socioeconomic growth and development. Technological Forecasting and Social Change Journal, 2001, vol. 68, no. 1, p. 1–57. 
  30. Dalgaard C. J., Strulik H. The physiological foundations of the wealth of nations. Journal of Economic Growth, 2015, vol. 20, no. 1, p. 37–73. 
  31. Menshikov S. M., Klimenko L. A. Long waves in the economy. When society changes skin. 2nd еd. Moscow, LENARD, 2014. (in Russ.) 
  32. Korotaev A. V., Tsirel S. V. Kondratievskie volny v mirovoy ekonomicheskoy dinamike [Kondratiev’s waves in the world economics dynamics] In: Halturina D. A., Korotaev A. V. (eds.). Sistemnyj monitoring. Global'noe i regional'noe razvitie. Moscow, Librokom/URSS, 2010, p. 189–229. (in Russ.) 
  33. Grinin L., Korotaev A. V., Tausch A. Economic Cycles, Crises and the Global Periphery. Springer, 2016. 
  34. Grinin L. E., Korotaev A. V., Grinberg R. S. (eds.). Krizisy i prognozy v svete teorii dlinnyh voln [Crises and forecast in the light of the long waves theory]. Volgograd, Uchitel' Publ., 2016. (in Russ.) 
  35. Grinin L., Grinin A., Korotaev A. Forthcoming Kondratieff wave, Cybernetic Revolution and global ageing.  Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2017, vol. 115, issue C,  p. 52-68. 
  36. Akamatsu K. A historical pattern of economic growth in developing countries. The Developing Economies, 1962, vol. 1, issue 1, p. 3–25. 
  37. Ozawa T. The Rise of Asia, the ‘Flying Geese’ Theory of Tandem Growth and Regional Agglomeration. Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, 2009. 
  38. Hirooka M. Innovation Dynamism and Economic Growth. A Nonlinear Perspective. Cheltenham, UK, Edward Elgar, 2006. 
  39. Shvab K. Chetvertaya promyshlennaya revolyutsiya [The fourth economic revolution]. Moscow, ANO DPO Corporation university of Sberbank, 2016. (in Russ.)
  40. Schäfer M. The Fourth Industrial Revolution: How the EU Can Lead It. European View, 2018, vol. 17 (1), p. 5–12. 
  41. Marsh P. The New Industrial Revolution: Consumers, Globalization and the End of Mass Production. 2012. 
  42. Geng H. Internet of Things and Data Analytics Handbook. New York, John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated, 2016. 
  43. Doucet A., Evers J., Guerra E., Lopez N., Soskil M., Timmers K. Teaching in the fourth industrial revolution: standing at the precipice. Abingdon, Oxon, New York, NY, Routledge, 2018. 
  44. Latour B. Reassembling the social: an introduction  to Actor-Network Theory. Oxford,: Oxford University Press, 2005. 
  45. Law J. STS as Method. In: The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. 4th ed. Cambridge, Massachusetts, The MIT Press, 2017, p. 31–58. 
  46. Law J., Hassard J. Actor network theory and after. Oxford, England, Blackwell, 1999. 
  47. Latour B., Woolgar S. Laboratory life: the construction of scientific facts. Princeton, New Jersey, Princeton University Press, 1986. 
  48. Bijker W., Hughes T., Pinch T. The social construction of technological systems: new directions in the sociology and history of technology. Cambridge, Massachusetts, MIT Press, 1987.  
  49. Callon M., Lascoumes P., Barthe Y. Acting in an Uncertain World: An Essay on Technical Democracy. Cambridge, The MIT Press, 2009. 
  50. Garfinkel H. Ethnomethodology's Program: Working Out Durkeim's Aphorism. Rowman & Littlefield, 2002. 
  51. Greiffenhagen C., Sharrock W. Does mathematics look certain in the front, but fallible in the back? Social Studies of Science, 2011, vol. 41, no. 6, p. 839–866. 
  52. Sormani P. An Ethnomethodological Study of Experimental Physics. Routledge, 2014. 
  53. Garfield E., Pudovrin A. I., Istomin V. S. Why Do We Need Algorithmic Historiography? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2003,vol. 54, no. 5, p. 400–412. 
  54. Rotoloab D., Hicksb D., Martinac B. R. What is an emerging technology? Research Policy, 2015, vol. 44, no. 10, p. 1827–1843. 
  55. Martin B. R. The Evolution of Science Policy and Innovation Studies. Research Policy, 2012, vol. 41, no. 2, p. 1219–39. 
  56. Waltman L., Eck N. J., Leeuwen T. N., Visser M. S., Raan A. F. J. Towards a New Crown Indicator: Some Theoretical Considerations.  Journal of Informetrics, 2011, vol. 5, no. 1,  p. 37–47. 
  57. Spence M. The Next Convergence: The Future of Economic Growth in a Multispeed World. New York, FSG Books, 2011. 
  58. Tur-Sinai O. Technological Progress and Well-Being. Loyola University Chicago Law Journal, 2016, vol. 48, no. 1, p. 145–-204. 
  59. Rouls Dzh. Teoriya spravedlivosti. Novosibirsk, NSU Publ., 1995. (in Russ.) 
  60. Sen A. Ob etike i ekonomike. Moscow, Nauka, 1996. (in Russ.) 
  61. Atkinson A. B. Economics as a Moral Science. Nuffield College, Oxford, 2008. 
  62. Merton R. Science and Technology in a Democratic Order. Journal of Legal and Political Sociology, 1942, no. 1, p. 115–126.  
  63. Jonge J. Rethinking Rational Choice Theory: A Companion on Rational and Moral Action. Palgrave Macmillan, UK, 2012. 
  64. Jasanoff S. Co-production of Science and Social Order. Routledge, 2004. 
  65. Hindriks J., Myles G. D. Intermediate Public Economics. Cambridge,New York, Cambridge University Press, 1996. (2nd ed. MIT Press, 2013.) 
  66. Novikova T. S. Public sector economics. Novosibirsk, NSU Publ., 2012. (in Russ.) 
  67. Atkinson A. B., Piketty T., Saez E. Top Incomes in the Long Run of History. Journal of Economic Literature, 2011, vol. 49, no. 1, p. 3–71. 
  68. Wyatt S., Milojevich S., Park H., Leydesdorff L. Intellectual and Practical Contributions of Scientometrics to STS. The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. 4th ed. Cambridge, Massachusetts, MIT Press, 2017, p. 87– 112. 
  69. Agacci E. Moral'noe izmerenie nauki i tehniki. Moscow, Moskovskij filosofskij fond, 1998. (in Russ.) 
  70. Piketti T. Kapital v XXI veke. Moscow, Ad Marginem, 2015. (in Russ.) 
  71. Gonzalez W. J.  (ed.). New Perspectives on Technology, Values, and Ethics: Theoretical and Practical. Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, 2015, vol. 315.  
  72. Johnson D. G., Powers T. M. Computer Systems and Responsibility: A Normative Look at Technological Complexity. Ethics and Information Technology, 2005, vol. 7, no. 2, p. 99–107. 
References: Novikova T. S., Korolkova M. V. Conceptual constructions of modern scientific and technological development: review of foreign approaches. World of Economics and Management. 2019, vol. 19, no. 1. С. 115–132. DOI: 10.25205/2542-0429-2019-19-1-115-132