State regulation of manufacturing and manufacturing markets

Abstract
The article gives a brief overview of key state legal, regulatory and forecast documents related to government regulation of production and the Russian manufacturing market developed and adopted in the second decade of this century. On the example of the implementation of government measures aimed at improving the structure of industrial production and solving the problems of staffing the functioning of manufacturing industries, unresolved problems in these areas of state regulation that persist at the end of the second decade are shown. Examples of foreign experience and some recommendations in the field of state regulation of the country's industrial development are given. It is shown that for radical investment growth, it is necessary to first of all solve structural problems in the economy, implement measures aimed at improving the business climate, developing competition and reducing the share of the public sector and stimulating consumer demand to intensify the investment activities of private business in the field of manufacturing. In order to accurately and reasonably assess the impact of government measures on the development of manufacturing in the country, it is necessary to develop a methodology for assessing the regulatory impact (ODS) in the direction of methods for assessing the impact of government decisions on the activation of innovation and the use of progressive technologies "Industry 4.0."

Keywords: state regulation measures, manufacturing, key documents, structural changes, import substitution, laws, state program, staffing

Funding: The research was carried out with the plan of IEIE SB RAS, project XI.172.1.1. № АААА-А17-117022250132-2

References:

1. Alibekov S., Plehanova E. State role in the economy. Bulletin of the Kaliningrad branch of the St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Interior Affairs of Russia,
   2012, no. 2 (28), p. 111–115. (in Russ.) 
2. LeFante S. Five main challenges facing the manufacturing industry. Hitachisolutions. 2018. (in Russ.) 
3. Abdikeev N. M., Bogachev Yu. S., Moreva E. L. Directions of perfection of state regulation of industrial development. Uchet. Analiz. Audit = Accounting. Analysis.
   Auditing, 2018, vol. 5, no. 4, p. 14–29. (in Russ.) DOI 10.26794/2408-9303-2018-5-4-14-29 
4. Bezhanov I. V. NPO Conversion is a tool for implementing defense industry diversification projects. In: Round table “Diversification of defense industry enterprises – a challenge of the  time and a realized need”, Moscow, June 26, 2019. (in Russ.) 
5. Alikin A. Results of five years of import substitution. Eurasianet, 2019, Dec. 2. (in Russ.)  
6. Bashkatova A. Import substitution came to naught. Nezavisimaya gazeta, 2019, 24 Sept. (in Russ.) URL: http// ng.ru›economics/2019-09-24/1_4_7684 
7. Kuznetsova G. V., Tsedilin L. I. IImport substitution: preliminary policy results for five years. Russian Foreign Economic Journal, 2019, no. 10, p. 7–25. (in Russ.) 
8. Likhachev A. There will be no personnel miracle in a single corporation. Vedomosti. 2019. 16 Dec. (in Russ.)  
9. Dudyrev F. F., Romanova O. A., Shabalin A. I. System of vocational education and training: keeping an ear to the needs of labor. Moscow, National Research University Higher School of Economics, 2018, 44 p. (in Russ.) 
10. Karlova N., Puzanova E., Bogacheva I. Why industrial enterprises do not invest: survey results. Analytic note Central Bank Russian Federation. Jan. 2020. (in Russ.)