J. Ladyman and E. J. Lowe: Patterns, Essence, and Truthmaking

Golovko N.
1. Novosibisrk State University, 1, Pirogova str,. Novosbirsk, 630090, Russian Federation
2. Institute of Philosophy and Law SB RAS, 8, Nikolaeva str., Novosibirsk, 630090, Russian Federation
golovko@philosophy.nsc.ru
The material was received by the Editorial Board: 14.10.2019
The paper aims to look for an adequate ontological explanation of the «second pattern» existence within Ladyman’s ITSR, the existence of which is a necessary condition that the analyzed pattern is a real pattern indeed. From Ladyman’s point of view, the ontological truthmaker for the epistemic fact is thus that it is a real pattern. As the core interpretation of truthmaking within Ladyman’s concept, we will take the interpretation of truthmaking as
essential dependence proposed by E.J. Lowe: an object is a truthmaker for the proposition when part of the essence of the proposition is that the proposition is true if the object exists. Taking into account a number of limitations of Lowe’s concept (essence precedes existence, essence is not an object, etc.), the existence of a “second pattern” within Ladyman’s conception should be understood via defining its essence, regardless of whether its very existence is ever confirmed.

Keywords: ontological explanation, essential dependence, second pattern existence, E.J. Lowe, J. Ladyman.
References: Nikita Golovko J. Ladyman and E. J. Lowe: Patterns, Essence, and Truthmaking. Siberian Journal of Philosophy. 2019, vol. 17, no. 4. P. 63–77. DOI: 10.25205/2541-7517-2019-17-4-63-77